Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Item-Coverage Diagnostics for Structural Breaks in Financial Statement Panels: Evidence from Westshore Terminals

Authors: Bell, Peter;

Item-Coverage Diagnostics for Structural Breaks in Financial Statement Panels: Evidence from Westshore Terminals

Abstract

AbstractEmpirical accounting research often treats firm-year financial statement variables as stable measurement objects. In practice, the face of financial statements evolves: new standards introduce new line items; firms add or drop disclosure modules; and reporting regimes shift. These changes create structural breaks that can silently damage panel comparability and bias derived metrics. This note proposes a simple, reproducible diagnostic - an item-coverage table - that records which line items appear in which years, allowing researchers to identify a consistently reported backbone set of items and to segment analysis when economically important items are regime-bounded. Using Westshore Terminals annual financial statements from 2010 to 2022, yielding 2009 to 2022 via comparatives, as a worked example, the diagnostic separates a stable backbone of revenue, expense, and working-capital items from era-dependent modules such as IFRS 16 lease items and mid-panel arrivals including deferred revenue, buybacks, and capex unpaid. Keywords comparability; structural breaks; IFRS 16; lease accounting; disclosure diagnostics; panel construction; item coverageJEL codes M41; M48; G31; G32; G35

Item-coverage diagnostics make structural breaks in multi-year financial statement panels explicit by publishing a canonical coverage table and derived era-module and feasibility views, demonstrated with Westshore Terminals where IFRS 16 leases, deferred revenue, buybacks, and capex-unpaid items define distinct measurement eras.

Keywords

economics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!