Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Standardised protocols for soil fauna extraction: crafting manuals, wet and dry extractors

Authors: Lu, Jing-Zhong; Tůmová, Michala; Briones, Maria J.I.; Cesarz, Simone; Eisenhauer, Nico; Fujii, Saori; Gongalsky, Konstantin; +19 Authors

Standardised protocols for soil fauna extraction: crafting manuals, wet and dry extractors

Abstract

Understanding the status and global trends of soil invertebrate diversity requires accurate and comparable data across geographical regions. However, soil animal extraction approaches still vary among laboratories, and no commonly accepted, openly available and well-documented protocols exist across taxa. Here, we present harmonised methodologies, assembled by an international group of experts, for extracting soil- and litter-inhabiting nematodes, enchytraeids, microarthropods, and larger invertebrates. Illustrated with images and videos, the protocols include advice for overcoming the most frequently encountered issues (‘expert tips’) for maximising extraction efficiency and reproducibility. In addition, we provide results from two pilot experiments that further improve nematode and large invertebrate extractions. We show that using two layers of milk filters instead of one in wet extraction of nematodes yields very similar extraction efficiency and has little effect on the sample cleanliness. Further, we demonstrate that on average 31.3% of large soil animals (body length 3 mm and longer) are overlooked during hand sorting but were captured by heat extraction of the sorted samples across three geographically distinct laboratories. Observed differences among the laboratories call for standardized tests of extraction efficiency of large soil animals across regions and research groups. Overall, we provide openly available expert protocols for assessing soil animal taxa in ecological studies worldwide, ultimately facilitating comparisons for a better understanding of the distribution and dynamics of soil biodiversity.

Keywords

microfauna, standardised methods, macrofauna, soil biodiversity, Invertebrates, Soil BON Foodweb, mesofauna

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center