Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Win-Win Solutions For Disagreements: Lessons For Effective Decision Making In Public Projects

Authors: Dr. Syed Bilal Shah; Sardar Muzaffar Hussain Zahid; Dr Muhammad Tufail; Dr. Shahid Iqbal;

Win-Win Solutions For Disagreements: Lessons For Effective Decision Making In Public Projects

Abstract

Projects of public interest are undertaken to provide utility and comfort to public at large. Such projects require proper planning and consultations. Even with prior homework and cautions, it is eminent that disputes and disagreements would arise because many stakeholders are involved in the decision making. In order to address their grievances and concerns, the project team and authorities negotiates with the affected persons to resolve their issues in a timely manner to avoid court cases and stay orders. In this study, qualitative document analysis method was used where the negotiations in BRT (Bus Rapid Transit), Peshawar were studied and analyzed from the environment, safety and safeguard policy reports available on ADB (Asian Development Bank) website from the period 2017 to 2022. The analysis shows that due to the effective policies of Asian development bank, the project team negotiated with the general public and affected persons which resulted in win-win solutions for the stakeholders and the project team.

Keywords

Grievance Redress Mechanism, BRT, Asian Development Bank, PDA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!