Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Audiovisual . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Audiovisual . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Video - Forty Years of Knowledge Development on Emotional Abuse and Suicide – AI-Assisted Bibliometric and Empirical Insights

Authors: Loredana Ileana Vîșcu; Ioana Eva Cădariu; Edward Watkins Jr. Clifton; Alina Cristina Constantin; Cristian Delcea; Costel Vasile Siserman; Andreea Ababei;

Video - Forty Years of Knowledge Development on Emotional Abuse and Suicide – AI-Assisted Bibliometric and Empirical Insights

Abstract

This bibliometric study investigates worldwide research patterns on emotional abuse and suicide in 898 papers from 1985 to 2025 using data from the Web of Science Core Collection analysed with VOSviewer to study keyword co-occurrence, thematic clusters, temporal development, and country-level collaboration. Five primary research clusters focusing on suicide, childhood trauma, depression, risk factors among adolescents, and emotion regulation were revealed by the analysis. The USA, Canada, China, and England were found to be core contributors in worldwide co-authorship networks.Additionally, an empirical observational analysis was performed on 50 anonymised inpatients from the Socola Institute of Psychiatry in Iasi, assessing the severity of depression (HAM-D), suicidal ideation (BSS) and clinical follow-up results over a period of nine months.In the empirical arm of this study, which involved 50 anonymised inpatients, depression severity scores (HAM-D) and suicidal ideation (BSS) showed significant reductions from admission to nine-month follow-up (p < 0.001), while residual depressive symptoms at discharge (HAM-D T1) independently predicted persistent suicidality (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.23, p = 0.014). Results point toward the intricate, multidisciplinary nature of the field and the increasing concentration on trauma-informed prevention approaches.

See full paper here: https://brain.edusoft.ro/index.php/brain/article/view/1938

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average