Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SCFL Falsification Conditions Version 1.0

Authors: Brogdon, Ronald;

SCFL Falsification Conditions Version 1.0

Abstract

The SCFL Falsification Conditions v1.0 define the canonical criteria under which an invariant, operator, or policy class is formally rejected within the Standard Coherence Fidelity Layer (SCFL) measurement discipline. This artifact establishes the non‑negotiable thresholds, collapse signatures, and admissibility boundaries that determine when a proposed structure fails to maintain coherence under perturbation, simulation, or comparative testing. The specification formalizes: Primary falsification triggers, including invariant drift, deformation beyond admissible bounds, rupture‑layer activation, and loss of recoverability Secondary failure signatures, such as spoof‑susceptibility, instability under cross‑domain transfer, and non‑convergence of observables The admissible region 𝒵, defining the allowable trajectory space for invariant‑induced behavior Collapse criteria, specifying when a system exits 𝒵 and enters a non‑recoverable or adversarially dominated regime Replayable falsification workflows, ensuring that all rejection events are reproducible, parameter‑frozen, and immune to post‑hoc reinterpretation A summary‑row reporting format, enabling consistent archival of falsification outcomes across institutions and testbeds These conditions serve as the scientific backbone of SCFL’s validation posture, ensuring that only invariants demonstrating stability, coherence, and spoof‑resistance under the frozen perturbation family advance to higher‑tier evaluation. This artifact is frozen as v1.0 for archival and citation.

Keywords

SCFL, Falsification Conditions, Invariant Failure, Collapse Criteria, Admissible Region 𝒵, Drift Detection, Rupture‑Layer Activation, Spoof‑Susceptibility, Recoverability Loss, Cross‑Domain Instability, Coherence Physics, Scientific Reproducibility, Reviewer‑Safe Validation, Perturbation‑Based Testing, Invariant Rejection Protocols

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average