Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SCFL Invariant Framework- Formal Specification v.1.0

Authors: Brogdon, Ronald;

SCFL Invariant Framework- Formal Specification v.1.0

Abstract

he SCFL Invariant Framework — Formal Specification v1.0 is the frozen, canonical definition of the invariant structure underlying the Standard Coherence Fidelity Layer (SCFL). This artifact formalizes the mathematical, structural, and operational rules governing how invariants are defined, evaluated, and subjected to perturbation‑based falsification within SCFL’s coherence‑physics architecture. The specification includes: A complete invariant scaffold, defining agents, state spaces, interaction graphs, and admissible policy classes The SCFL Property Set (P1–P6), expressed as constraint‑plus‑proxy formulations suitable for empirical testing Collapse criteria and rupture‑layer conditions, enabling detection of drift, deformation, and instability The admissible region 𝒵, defined as the set of trajectories satisfying SCFL’s invariant constraints under the frozen perturbation family A sufficiency‑shaped statement, linking invariant‑induced policies to measurable coherence, recoverability, and spoof‑resistance Formal definitions of SCFL observables (C(t), R(t), L(t)) with domain, range, and boundedness assumptions A non‑drifting, reviewer‑safe structure, ensuring that all parameters are locked ex‑ante and cannot be tuned post‑hoc This specification serves as the foundational reference for all SCFL simulations, comparative invariant testing, Tier‑0.5 demonstrations, and cross‑domain validation work. It is frozen as v1.0 and intended for archival, citation, and scientific reproducibility.

Keywords

SCFL, Invariant Framework, Coherence Physics, Formal Specification, Admissible Region 𝒵, Property Set P1–P6, Collapse Criteria, Rupture‑Layer Dynamics, Invariant‑Induced Policies, Drift Detection, Recoverability Metrics, Spoof‑Resistance, Falsification Protocols, Cross‑Domain Validation, Scientific Reproducibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average