Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Engaging with regulators on the use of new evidence in decision making (D6.4)

Authors: Allen, Christine; Beukelaers, Pierre; Pylarinou, Elisavet; Roudot, Pauline; Rogers, Raquel; Kalra, Dipak;

Engaging with regulators on the use of new evidence in decision making (D6.4)

Abstract

Task 6.4: Engaging with regulators on the use of new evidence in decision making To demonstrate the ability of the ecosystem and ConcePTION pipeline to generate useful information in a timely fashion on safety of medications in pregnancy and breastfeeding work was completed across several work packages. Work packages 1-4 were engaged in addressing generation of evidence from different underlying data sources. Work package 7 enabled the rapid generation of high-quality evidence from WP1 & 2 by providing governance rules, ethical standards and an IT infrastructure for data harmonization, sharing of data and data characterization. In addition, throughout the lifetime of ConcePTION project WP6 members conducted examinations with each of the scientific work packages to assess the potential relevance of their work to regulatory decisionmakers. A series of demonstration studies have been conducted in WP1 (population-based data sources), WP2 (reported pregnancies by women and their HCP), WP3 (develop, characterize, validate and apply a nonclinical testing platform for reliable prediction of medicine concentrations in human breast milk along with systemic exposure of breastfed infants to maternal medicines) and WP4 (breast milk transfer preclinical and in silico modelling, and human milk biobank sampling with drug concentration studies). The choice of the specific studies is based on pre-defined criteria, such as demonstration of the ability to detect associations between medication use and a range of birth/child outcomes (WP1 & 2), testing a range of medications with differing physico-chemical properties, e.g., including lipophilic, hydrophilic and biologicals (WP3 & WP 4), clinical relevance (aligned with stakeholder priorities and needs; WP6) and quality assessment of case identification algorithms (WP7). Examples range from simple drug utilization/ event rates to the complexity of associations studies on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of antidepressant use during pregnancy. The scientific use cases will test and illustrate the ConcePTION ecosystem: data, methods, collaboration, governance, and analytical tools for the entire range of users

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!