Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Current Research Bul...arrow_drop_down
Current Research Bulletin
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Impact of Climatic Variability and Extremes on Livestock Water and Fodder Use in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces of South Africa

Authors: Azwihangwisi, E. Nesamvuni; Gabriel, R. Lekalakala; Khuthadzo Ndwambi; Khathutshelo, A. Tshikolomo; Brilliant, M. Petja; Tsumbedzo, J. Mavhungu;

The Impact of Climatic Variability and Extremes on Livestock Water and Fodder Use in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces of South Africa

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of Smallholder Livestock Farmers (SHLF) about the impact of climatic variability and extremes on livestock water and fodder use in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces. Data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire for an interview of 366 SHLF. The main sources of water for SHLF were perceived to be rivers (41%), municipal/piped water (40%) and boreholes (33%). Only 3 % and 7 % of the farmers were believed to have used wells and dams/ponds respectively as water sources for livestock. Cattle were perceived to have obtained water from 1-10 km, mainly from rivers. The majority of SHLF (97%) was believed to have accessed fodder from communal grazing. Even with the use of crop residues (59%) and own crop harvest (35%), inadequate grazing was perceived to be the biggest challenge for cattle and sheep. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that: (1) early warning information be interpreted and regularly presented to SHLF, (2) livestock reduction is encouraged when the adverse climate is anticipated, and (3) earth dams be constructed to harvest flood water at strategic catchment points for use in times of scarcity.

Keywords

Communal grazing, Borehole, Crop Residue, Early Warning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!