
This repository contains supplementary materials for the following journal paper: Valdemar Švábenský, Brendan Flanagan, Erwin Daniel López Zapata, and Atsushi Shimada.Open Datasets in Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Best PRACTICE.ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 2026.https://doi.org/10.1145/3798096 Preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17314 @article{Svabensky2026open, author = {\v{S}v\'{a}bensk\'{y}, Valdemar and Flanagan, Brendan and López Zapata, Erwin Daniel and Shimada, Atsushi}, title = {{Open Datasets in Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Best PRACTICE}}, journal = {ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD)}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, year = {2026}, volume = {20}, number = {4}, numpages = {56}, issn = {1556-4681}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3798096}, doi = {10.1145/3798096}, } Repository content: Dataset, code, and additional materials for the paper. See the README.md file in the attached ZIP archive for details. Attribution (How to cite): If you use or build upon the materials, please use the BibTeX or full-text citation entry above to cite the source paper. Contact: If you notice any issues or breaches of the license terms of this dataset, please contact Valdemar Švábenský using the email address listed in the paper.
learning analytics, educational data mining, data sharing, systematic mapping study, artificial intelligence in education, systematic literature review, open data, public data, open science, survey, data management, AI in education
learning analytics, educational data mining, data sharing, systematic mapping study, artificial intelligence in education, systematic literature review, open data, public data, open science, survey, data management, AI in education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
