Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

STYLISTIC DIFFERENTIATION ACROSS GENRES: LITERARY AND MEDIA TEXTS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Authors: Bozorova Madina Mahmudovna Senior Lecturer, Department of Foreign Languages, Samarkand State University of Architecture and Construction;

STYLISTIC DIFFERENTIATION ACROSS GENRES: LITERARY AND MEDIA TEXTS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

This study examines stylistic differentiation across genres through a comparative analysis of literary and media texts, focusing on how linguistic choices reflect communicative purposes, audience expectations, and contextual constraints. Drawing on principles of stylistics, discourse analysis, and genre theory, the research investigates key stylistic features such as lexical selection, syntactic patterns, figurative language, cohesion, and pragmatic strategies. Literary texts are analyzed for their aesthetic, expressive, and interpretative functions, while media texts are examined in terms of informational density, persuasion, and immediacy. The comparative approach highlights both convergence and divergence in stylistic practices, demonstrating how genre conventions shape textual organization and meaning-making processes. The findings reveal that while literary discourse tends to prioritize stylistic creativity and ambiguity, media discourse favors clarity, accessibility, and rhetorical impact. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of genre-based stylistic variation and underscores the importance of stylistic awareness in textual analysis, language education, and media literacy. Keywords: stylistic differentiation; genre analysis; literary texts; media texts; discourse analysis; comparative stylistics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!