
This study is devoted to the characterization of popular local anesthetics and the determination of the mosteffective drugs for local anesthesia. The authors conducted a review of current scientific publications examining theproperties of local anesthetics, their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, as well as methods of application.The study was carried out in two directions: using traditional printed sources and online databases. The collecteddata allowed for a comparative analysis of the medications, taking into account their beneficial properties and potentialside effects. As a result of this analysis, the drug with the optimal balance of favorable characteristics was identified.During the research, key criteria determining the choice of the drug were identified: efficacy, duration of the latent period,duration of action, and level of toxicity. To perform local anesthesia during a surgical intervention, an anesthetic withhigh efficacy and a rapid onset of action (short latency time) is required. It is essential that the anesthetic provide a longlastinganalgesic effect, allowing for a single administration even during prolonged surgery while maintaining low toxicity.Seven local anesthetics were analyzed in the study: procaine (novocaine), lidocaine, tetracaine (dicaine), benzocaine(anesthesin), articaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine. Comparative data revealed certain disadvantages for each drug.Procaine (novocaine) is prone to causing allergic reactions, while lidocaine is characterized by a relatively short durationof action. The high toxicity of tetracaine (dicaine) makes it unsuitable for conduction, infiltration, and epidural anesthesia.Benzocaine (anesthesin), due to its low water solubility, is not suitable for parenteral administration. Articaine stands outamong local anesthetics due to its high potency-to-toxicity ratio, which accounts for its priority use in clinical practice asa local anesthetic.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
