Orbital space stations operate in an environment characterized by near-continuous exposure to unattenuated solar irradiance of approximately 1.36 kW m−2 a condition that—under classical efficiency-based energy analysis—would imply the availability of abundant onboard power. Contrary to this expectation, all operational space stations exhibit persistent and severe power constraints, necessitating strict energy rationing, load prioritization, and continuous suppression of non-essential activities. This discrepancy between theoretical solar input and realized usable energy output cannot be satisfactorily explained using component-level efficiency or photovoltaic conversion metrics alone. In this work, we demonstrate that space stations are intrinsically energy-survival-limited systems, rather than energy-input-limited systems. Using the Unified Energy Survival–Conversion Law, Euseful=Ein⋅Ψ⋅Cint, with the survival factor defined as Ψ=AE/TE+ε, we show that the majority of incident solar energy fails to survive successive thermodynamic loss stages required for system operation. Absorbed energy AE is rapidly consumed or degraded by mandatory life-support processes, continuous thermal regulation, radiation shielding, redundancy enforcement, and entropy-producing control architectures. Transport losses TE and irreducible entropy generation ε scale superlinearly with station activity, mass, and thermal load, imposing a hard upper bound on energy survivability independent of photovoltaic efficiency. Furthermore, even surviving energy is constrained by finite internal conversion capacity Cint, determined by electrical bus limits, power conditioning throughput, actuator duty cycles, electrochemical reaction rates, and biological metabolic ceilings. Empirical station-level power budgets indicate that only a small fraction of captured solar energy—typically well below 30% of array output and far below raw incident flux—can be converted into discretionary mechanical, computational, or experimental work, with the remainder irreversibly dissipated to maintain system survival. This survival-based framework quantitatively explains the observed saturation of usable onboard power with increasing solar array area, the dominance of thermal and life-support loads in station energy budgets, and the failure of input-scaling strategies to produce proportional gains in operational capability. The results establish a thermodynamically grounded upper bound on space-station energy utilization and demonstrate that future orbital habitats cannot overcome power limitations through increased solar collection alone. Instead, meaningful performance gains require fundamental reductions in energy survival losses or breakthroughs in conversion throughput—constraints that are ultimately governed by the second law of thermodynamics. Please check the attachment for details