Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

LINGUISTIC AND LINGUACULTURAL ASPECTS OF CHILDREN'S ANECDOTES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

Authors: Farangis Aliaskar kizi; KhasanovaGulnozaAkramkizi;

LINGUISTIC AND LINGUACULTURAL ASPECTS OF CHILDREN'S ANECDOTES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the linguistic and linguacultural aspects of children’s anecdotes in the Uzbek and English languages. Children’s anecdotes, as a distinct genre of oral discourse, reflect children’s cognitive processes, communicative strategies, and the transmission of cultural values through language. The main aim of the study is to identify both universal and culture-specific features found in children’s anecdotes across different linguistic and cultural contexts. The research adopts a qualitative approach and is based on a corpus of children’s anecdotal texts in Uzbek and English. The analysis employs lexical, syntactic, stylistic, pragmatic, and linguacultural frameworks. Lexical analysis focuses on everyday vocabulary and humor-generating mechanisms, while syntactic analysis examines sentence structure and dialogic patterns. Stylistic and pragmatic approaches are applied to identify expressive means and communicative intentions, and linguacultural analysis reveals the reflection of national mentality and social values in humorous discourse. The results demonstrate that children’s anecdotes in both languages share universal characteristics such as simplicity, cognitive accessibility, and humor based on logical incongruity. At the same time, significant linguacultural differences are observed. English children’s anecdotes tend to rely on wordplay, irony, and individualistic expression, whereas Uzbek anecdotes are more often based on situational humor, literal interpretation, and culturally familiar contexts that emphasize collective and moral values. The study highlights the close interaction between language and culture in children’s discourse and contributes to the fields of comparative linguistics, folklore studies, and intercultural communication.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average