
This record contains the bilingual publication (Spanish and English) of a philosophical manifesto that establishes the axiomatic-deductive foundations for a critique of processual reason and a reconstruction of political humanism. Content The manifesto proposes five axioms grounded in the Western philosophical tradition (Boethius, Aristotle, Kant, Lévinas, Arendt, Spaemann, Jonas, Mounier, MacIntyre): Categorical distinction between person and thing (Boethius, Aquinas, Spaemann, Taylor, Ricoeur) Irreducibility of moral judgment to technical procedure (Aristotle: phronesis vs techne; Dreyfus, Nussbaum) The person as end in itself (Kant, Mounier, Sen, Nussbaum, Sandel) Responsibility as constitutive of the moral subject (Lévinas, Jonas, Bauman) The capacity to initiate (Arendt: natality; Rosa) From these axioms, eight theorems are derived with logical necessity, addressing: the non-delegability of moral decisions, the moral nature of political decisions, structural dehumanization through algorithmic delegation, the humanism/materialism axis as superior to left/right, normative parasitism of materialism, convergence of all materialisms, education as civilizational battlefield, and subsidiarity as axiomatic requirement. For each axiom, a negation landscape is exhibited: the world that results from denying it. The diagnosis: contemporary processual systems operate as if these axioms did not exist, producing a functional eclipse of the person. Full philosophical demonstrations are developed in The Eclipse of the Person: A Critique of Processual Reason (forthcoming). Files manifiesto_ES.pdf — Spanish version with abstracts in Spanish and English manifiesto_EN.pdf — English version with abstract in English manifiesto_bilingüe.pdf — English and Spanish version with abstract in English Relation to other works This manifesto is the theoretical foundation for: El Eclipse de la Persona: Crítica de la Razón Procesual (book, forthcoming) Academic articles on AI ethics and AI pedagogy (forthcoming)
This manifesto presents the axiomatic foundations for a triptych of companion articles currently in preparation, addressing AI governance, AI-person interaction, and philosophy of education respectively. Each companion article is self-contained and cites this manifesto as its foundational framework. The original version was written in Spanish; the English edition is an authorised translation by the author.
Equivalence relations, Person, Artificial intelligence, Political humanism, Order relations, Surveillance capitalism, Subsidiarity, Catholic social doctrine, Axiomatic system, Moral judgment, Technofeudalism, Capabilities approach, Philosophy of technology, Ethics of AI, Political materialism
Equivalence relations, Person, Artificial intelligence, Political humanism, Order relations, Surveillance capitalism, Subsidiarity, Catholic social doctrine, Axiomatic system, Moral judgment, Technofeudalism, Capabilities approach, Philosophy of technology, Ethics of AI, Political materialism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
