Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL INDICATORS OF PAEONIA LACTIFLORA AND GINKGO BILOBA

Authors: Xolboyev Yusufjon Xakimovnch; Shodmonaliyev Abdulaziz Azamatjon ugli;

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL INDICATORS OF PAEONIA LACTIFLORA AND GINKGO BILOBA

Abstract

Medicinal plants play an important role as sources of biologically active compounds in the pharmaceutical industry. This study is aimed at analyzing the phytochemical composition of Paeonia lactiflora and Ginkgo biloba and evaluating their pharmaceutical parameters. In the course of the study, Paeonia lactiflora roots and Ginkgo biloba leaves were used as plant raw materials. The results of the phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and glycosides in both plants. Ginkgo biloba was distinguished by its high content of flavonoids and phenolic compounds, while Paeonia lactiflora showed a high level of monoterpene glycosides, particularly paeoniflorin. The presence of the main biologically active compounds was confirmed using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). During the evaluation of pharmaceutical parameters, moisture content, total ash, and extractive values were determined, and their compliance with pharmacopoeial requirements was confirmed. The obtained results indicate that Paeonia lactiflora and Ginkgo biloba are promising for use in pharmaceutical practice.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average