
Contemporary debates surrounding transgender identity often frame gender variance as a modern phenomenon incompatible with the Abrahamic traditions. However, historical and textual evidence from Christianity, Judaism, and Islam demonstrates that gender diversity has long existed within these faiths, sometimes accommodated legally, sometimes interpreted symbolically, and in certain Christian contexts even canonised. This study examines theological anthropology and historical sources to assess how gender-variant individuals were understood within late antique Christianity, rabbinic Judaism, and classical Islamic jurisprudence. Special attention is given to early Christian monastic hagiographies describing figures such as Eugenia of Rome, Marina the Monk, and Euphrosyne of Alexandria, whose lives included sustained social gender transition and whose narratives were preserved in ecclesial tradition. Drawing upon primary sources and contemporary scholarship in theology, patristics, rabbinics, and Islamic law, this article argues that while modern transgender categories cannot be simplistically retrojected onto ancient figures, gender variance has never been absent from Abrahamic religious history. Moreover, early Christian ascetic theology created conceptual space in which crossing gender categories could be interpreted as spiritually meaningful rather than morally transgressive. The existence of such traditions challenges claims that transgender identity is wholly foreign to faith and invites renewed theological reflection in 2026 and beyond.
Islam/psychology, Christian Science/psychology, Judaism/psychology, Judaism, Islam/history, Judaism/history, Christian Science, Christian Science/history, Islam, islam, judaism, History of islam
Islam/psychology, Christian Science/psychology, Judaism/psychology, Judaism, Islam/history, Judaism/history, Christian Science, Christian Science/history, Islam, islam, judaism, History of islam
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
