Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Magnetic-Basis Entanglement Chronoscopy in the Aether Physics Model

Authors: Thomson, David;

Magnetic-Basis Entanglement Chronoscopy in the Aether Physics Model

Abstract

Magnetic-Basis Entanglement Chronoscopy in the Aether Physics Model This preprint develops a ledger-first quantification of attosecond, channel-resolved photoionization time delays in helium using the Aether Physics Model (APM) and Quantum Measurement Units (QMU). The central move is to recast the experimentally extracted group delay (Wigner--Smith / Eisenbud--Wigner--Smith delay) into a dimensionless "delay-count" that is native to QMU primitives:\[N(\varepsilon) \equiv \tau F_q = \frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{d\varepsilon},\qquad\varepsilon \equiv \frac{E}{E_C},\qquadE_C \equiv m_e c^2.\]In this form, attosecond chronoscopy becomes a direct measurement of phase-slope in normalized energy, without requiring SI seconds in the main derivation. The paper then proposes a minimal "Aether-attachment" ansatz for interelectronic coherence and entanglement unfolding. The outgoing photoelectron is modeled as a compact Compton-function excitation whose finite-time linkage to the residual ion is mediated by the magnetic-charge basis and the Aether unit through a photon-action closure of the form\[\mathrm{phtn} = A_u\, {e_\mathrm{emax}}^{2}.\]Using Ledger One closure, written generically as\[A_u \cdot \mathrm{curl} = c^2,\]the photon-action atom closes directly on the QMU primitive set, motivating a magnetic-basis treatment for the attachment/exchange mechanism. A two-channel residual-ion subspace is coupled by a transient linkage\[g(t) = g_0\,e^{-t/\tau_{\mathrm{ent}}}, \qquad t \ge 0,\]producing a second-order, level-repulsion-like phase imprint on the channel difference. A geometric overlap argument fixes the coherence fraction as\[\chi = \zeta\,\alpha,\]where $\alpha$ is interpreted geometrically via scale separation between the electron torus minor radius (classical radius scale $r_e$) and the Bohr organization radius $(\alpha_0)$ through\[\alpha^{2} = \frac{r_e}{\alpha_0}.\]With $\tau_{\mathrm{ent}}$ parameterized on the Bohr-period scale, the resulting contrast delay obeys a falsifiable collapse prediction:\[\Delta N(\varepsilon)\,\delta(\varepsilon)^{2} \approx \mathrm{constant},\qquad\delta(\varepsilon) \equiv \frac{\Delta E}{E_C}.\]Here $\delta(\varepsilon)$ is re-parameterized about a reference $\varepsilon_0$ for numerical stability inside a chosen data window. This "collapse test" is proposed as an immediately checkable diagnostic in channel-resolved TDSE outputs or future streaking/RABBIT experiments: if the Aether-attachment mechanism captures the dominant scaling, plotting $\Delta N\,\delta^{2}$ versus $\varepsilon$ should yield a near-flat curve for fixed dressing conditions. The manuscript anchors the model to a published helium benchmark channel-contrast $\lvert\Delta\tau\rvert \approx 232~\mathrm{as}$, converting this directly into a QMU normalization target $\lvert\Delta N\rvert \approx 2.9\times 10^{4}$ and deriving an explicit constraint algebra for the combined dimensionless prefactor. The narrative is connected to the author's companion APM photoelectric series on photon-action transport, coherence-window quantization, and cardioid photon expansion, which provide additional context for photon-action-mediated exchange. This work is intended as a draft scaffold for targeted falsification: it specifies which measured or simulated quantities are required (channel phases/delays, fitted $\delta(\varepsilon)$), what plots to make (collapse and rescaling checks), and what parameter combinations are constrained by the helium benchmark.

Keywords

interelectronic coherence, photoionization time delay, RABBIT, Wigner-Smith delay, streaking, Quantum Measurement Units, helium, Aether Physics Model, Eisenbud-Wigner-Smith, attosecond chronoscopy, entanglement, magnetic charge

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!