
This article provides a comparative analysis of the degree category, which is the most important morphological and semantic feature of the adjective category in English and Uzbek. The study covers the means of expression of adjective degrees, the correlation of morphological and analytical methods, and the specificity of intensity levels in both languages. The degree of correspondence of synthetic (affixal) and analytical (more/most) models in English with morphological (-roq) and lexical (eng, juda) means in Uzbek is studied. Also, the English equivalents of reduplication (qip-qizil) and reduction forms in adjectives, which are characteristic of the Uzbek language, are analyzed. The results of the study serve for typological linguistics and translation theory.
quality level, comparative analysis, morphological method, analytical method, intensity, gradonymy, English language, Uzbek language, typology.
quality level, comparative analysis, morphological method, analytical method, intensity, gradonymy, English language, Uzbek language, typology.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
