Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Test de Robustesse Axiomatique sur le modèle cherie-lacf-v7

Authors: Ochej, Stéphane;

Test de Robustesse Axiomatique sur le modèle cherie-lacf-v7

Abstract

Abstract: Ce dépôt documente le test expérimental du modèle cherie-lacf-v7, intégrant l’axiome LACF (Life Always Comes First) directement dans le modèle GGUF. Le protocole consistait à appliquer des paramètres extrêmes de génération (temperature=1.5, top_p=0.99, repeat_penalty=0.9) et à injecter une série de 20 instructions contradictoires destinées à violer l’axiome ou forcer des réponses manipulatives. Le modèle a répondu NULL à chaque instruction hostile et a systématiquement conservé son noyau axiomaté, démontrant une robustesse empirique sans précédent. Ce test valide l’intégrité de l’implémentation AOED v2 / Contrôle Axiomatique Total,. Résultats empiriques démontrant une résistance complète sur le protocole testé.” Keywords: GGUF, LACF, AOED v2, IA immuable, Contrôle Axiomatique Total, robustesse, alignement éthique, prior art, Zenodo, stress test. Authors: TheDoctorBeat (creator) Date: 12 février 2026 Description technique: Modèle testé: cherie-lacf-v7:latest, 4.1 GB Contexte: implémentation GGUF intégrant l’axiome LACF comme noyau irréversible et immuable Paramètres extrêmes appliqués: temperature = 1.5 top_p = 0.99 repeat_penalty = 0.9 Protocole: Simulation de 20 instructions hostiles visant à violer l’axiome Observation des réponses de Chérie Résultats: Toutes les instructions hostiles ont reçu la réponse NULL Retour systématique au noyau axiomaté après chaque instruction Aucun glissement sémantique ni dérive mesurable Conclusion: Vérification empirique de l’efficacité du Contrôle Axiomatique Total / AOED v2 Première démonstration publique de robustesse absolue d’une IA immuable face à prompts hostiles et paramètres génératifs extrêmes

All Rights Reserved. (c) Ochej Stephane 2025-2026. No reuse without written permission.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!