Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Technical Architecture of the Core Emotion Framework: A Functional Analysis of the Decalogue of Operators

Authors: Bulgaria, Jamel;

The Technical Architecture of the Core Emotion Framework: A Functional Analysis of the Decalogue of Operators

Abstract

The Core Emotion Framework (CEF), as conceptualized and formalized by JamelBulgaria, represents a fundamental departure from traditional categorical anddimensional models of affect. Within the landscape of modern cognitive science andaffective computation, the CEF introduces a structural-constructivist architecture thattreats emotional states not as passive qualitative experiences, but as active functionaloperators—internal powers—that modulate cognitive, somatic, and conative systems.This framework, hosted and disseminated via OptimizeYourCapabilities.com and the CEFScholarly Archive, organizes human emotional movement into a tripartite system ofHead, Heart, and Gut centers, governed by a "Decalogue" of ten discrete operators.The primary utility of this framework lies in its precision; by defining emotions asfunctional mechanisms, the CEF provides a technical manual for self-regulation, clinicalintervention, and the development of synthetic affect in artificial intelligence.

Core Emotion Framework, CEF, emotional operators, internal powers, Head center,Heart center, Gut center, Sensing, Calculating, Deciding, Expanding, Constricting,Achieving, Arranging, Appreciating, Boosting, Accepting, operator cycling, scalarmechanism, Counting Up, Counting Down, emotional agility, structural-constructivistmodel, synthetic affect, affective computation, emotional architecture, tripartitesystem, center fusion, emotional differentiation, operator protocols, Deciding Protocol,Achieving Protocol, Boosting Protocol, Appreciating Protocol, emotional regulation,cognitive-somatic integration, conative grounding, emotional aperture, emotionalstandards, emotional momentum, GPAP, GoodPerson Anxiety Pattern, INTIMABenchmark, affective AI, emotional state-shifting, emotional system design,psychological flexibility, structural presence

The Ten Operators of the Core Emotion Framework (Canonical List) The following list represents the authoritative and canonical ordering of the ten CoreEmotion Framework operators and supersedes all prior or informal enumerations. Head Center1. Sensing (outgoing)2. Calculating (reflecting)3. Deciding (balancing) Heart Center4. Expanding (outgoing)5. Constricting (reflecting)6. Achieving (balancing) Gut Center7. Arranging (outgoing)8. Appreciating (reflecting)9. Boosting (balancing) Cross‐Center Completion10. Accepting Note: In some practitioner materials, Accepting is described as the Gut’s “off-modebalancer,” while Boosting is the Gut’s “on-mode balancer.” For clarity and consistency,this document classifies Accepting as the cross-center completion operator.

{"@context": "https://schema.org","@type": "DefinedTermSet","name": "CEF Operators","description": "The ten functional operators of the Core Emotion Framework.","hasDefinedTerm": [{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Sensing"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Calculating"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Deciding"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Expanding"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Constricting"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Achieving"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Arranging"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Appreciating"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Boosting"},{"@type": "DefinedTerm", "name": "Accepting"}]}

This document formally defines the ten operators of the Core Emotion Framework and establishes their canonical structure for scholarly, clinical, and computational use.

Keywords

Core Emotion Framework, CEF

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!