
We propose Intrinsic Quality Theory (IQT), a framework identifying phenomenal quality with the intrinsic physical state of bounded spacetime regions. Unlike functionalist theories, IQT treats quality as an identity, not an emergent property of information processing. The theory is formalized using Algebraic Quantum Field Theory (AQFT) on causal sets, defining a region’s quality as the local algebra–state pair, up to physically induced isomorphism. A constraint-based argument shows this pair is the unique mathematical object satisfying the requirements any candidate for “intrinsic nature” must meet. Central commitments include the perspectival relativity of quality (no privileged “view from nowhere”) and an effective-theory framework bridging fundamental and neural scales. The geometry of effective causal diamonds generates temporal phenomenology — including the asymmetry between panoramic spatial and fleeting temporal experience — without additional postulates. The theory dissolves the subject-selection debate by separating universal quality from narrative selfhood, and provides a non-ad-hoc mechanism for composition of experience grounded in correlation structure. The paper presents three concrete empirical protocols (titrated propofol anesthesia, within-hemisphere parcellation, psychedelic temporal phenomenology) that generate distinct predictions separating IQT from Integrated Information Theory and Global Neuronal Workspace theory.
Consciousness, Neurology, Quantum physics
Consciousness, Neurology, Quantum physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
