
A Penrose diagram is often presented as a global representation of spacetime, yet its construction removes the very mathematical structures required to define spacetime itself. The conformal compactification eliminates the metric, tangent spaces, vectors, affine structure, and curvature, leaving behind a picture whose meaning depends entirely on prior knowledge of the full spacetime. The diagram does not contain null cones, causal relations, or vector structure; it only marks where such features existed before being stripped away. Treating the diagram as if it preserved geometry or causality introduces internal inconsistencies, because the abstraction no longer obeys invariance, covariance, or the logical coherence required of a legitimate physical representation. Its apparent explanatory power arises from projecting the original metric back onto a picture that no longer contains it. A Penrose diagram is therefore not a selfcontained model of spacetime but a symbolic sketch of causal type, meaningful only through external assumptions about the underlying geometry.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
