Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Non-Valvular Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Cooont Analysis

Authors: Camilo Fernández Bravo, MD/ PhD/ FACC;

Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Non-Valvular Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Cooont Analysis

Abstract

This study evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and coexisting kidney disease. Using a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort analysis, the research aims to minimize confounding variables and provide balanced comparisons between treatment groups. The investigation focuses on key clinical outcomes, including prevention of thromboembolic events, particularly ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, as well as safety endpoints such as major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and overall mortality. Special emphasis is placed on how varying degrees of renal impairment influence anticoagulant pharmacokinetics, therapeutic effectiveness, and adverse event risk. The study seeks to clarify whether DOACs offer superior or comparable clinical benefits to VKAs in patients with chronic kidney disease, potentially supporting optimized anticoagulation strategies and personalized treatment selection in this high-risk population.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!