Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

HUMAN MATHEMATICAL REASONING IN THE AI ERA : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND COGNITIVE DEPENDENCY

Authors: Ms. Gauravi Raorane;

HUMAN MATHEMATICAL REASONING IN THE AI ERA : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND COGNITIVE DEPENDENCY

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of contemporary mathematics education, offering tools that support problem-solving, feedback, and conceptual understanding. This study investigates the influence of AI on human mathematical reasoning, with particular emphasis on skill development and cognitive dependency. Data were collected from 173 undergraduate students using a structured questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. The study examines relationships between AI usage, mathematical reasoning ability, comparative reasoning performance, and cognitive dependency. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between AI usage and mathematical reasoning skills (r = 0.65), as well as comparative reasoning performance (r = 0.60), indicating that AI-assisted learning enhances accuracy, efficiency, and the ability to evaluate multiple solution strategies. However, results also show a moderate positive correlation between AI usage and cognitive dependency (r = 0.48), suggesting that excessive reliance on AI tools may reduce independent problem-solving and critical thinking. Survey responses further indicate that many students prefer manual problem-solving for better conceptual retention and deeper understanding. The study concludes that AI is most effective when used as a supportive learning aid rather than a replacement for human reasoning. Balanced and guided integration of AI can enhance mathematical learning outcomes while preserving essential cognitive and analytical skills.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average