This paper presents a structural model of collapse and recovery, arguing that the experience commonly described as a “life getting small” reflects a degradation of three foundational capacities: continuity, awareness, and agency. Rather than framing collapse as a moral or psychological failure, the paper analyzes it as a narrowing of the orientation system through which individuals perceive time, evaluate possibilities, and enact choice. Recovery is described not as a dramatic transformation but as the gradual re‑stabilization of these capacities, allowing the world to expand and new futures to become viable.The paper also examines the social geometry of recovery, showing how individuals gravitate toward groups whose collapse patterns resemble their own. This fragmentation is interpreted not as judgment but as structural self‑protection: people seek environments that mirror their lived geometry because such environments reduce cognitive strain and support the re‑emergence of orientation. A generalizable example illustrates how early signs of reopening appear in subtle shifts of perception and behavior long before major changes occur.By reframing collapse and recovery in structural terms, the paper offers a hopeful, non‑stigmatizing account of how lives reopen and how agency returns.