
The Independent Curriculum, which strongly emphasizes student autonomy and holistic development, marks a paradigm shift in education. The efficiency of Social Sciences Learning assessment techniques is essential in this framework. This study aims to integrate the findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide a more complete picture of effective assessment strategies in the Independent curriculum. In terms of methods, this study uses a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative and qualitative techniques and in-depth analysis in MAXQDA software. To obtain the data, teachers were interviewed from their perspective about their experience of conducting evaluation procedures in Social Sciences Learning. This information was collected through observations from four teachers in four different elementary schools. This synthetic approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics that affect the assessment of Social Sciences Learning in the Independent curriculum. Rigid data management and analysis is made easier with MAXQDA, enabling effective investigation of new themes and patterns. The results identify areas for improvement and provide insight into how assessment strategies and curriculum goals fit together. Finally, this research guides pedagogical practices and promotes sustainable development within Indonesia's education system.
independent curriculum, Social Sciences Learning, assessment strategies, mixed method approach, MAXQDA
independent curriculum, Social Sciences Learning, assessment strategies, mixed method approach, MAXQDA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
