Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
INTERNATIONAL JOURNA...arrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Practice Strategies of Social Sciences Learning Assessment in the Independent Curriculum: A Mixed-Method Study in Indonesian Elementary Schools

Authors: Adita Mahendra; Heru Subrata; Ganes Gunansyah;

Practice Strategies of Social Sciences Learning Assessment in the Independent Curriculum: A Mixed-Method Study in Indonesian Elementary Schools

Abstract

The Independent Curriculum, which strongly emphasizes student autonomy and holistic development, marks a paradigm shift in education. The efficiency of Social Sciences Learning assessment techniques is essential in this framework. This study aims to integrate the findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide a more complete picture of effective assessment strategies in the Independent curriculum. In terms of methods, this study uses a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative and qualitative techniques and in-depth analysis in MAXQDA software. To obtain the data, teachers were interviewed from their perspective about their experience of conducting evaluation procedures in Social Sciences Learning. This information was collected through observations from four teachers in four different elementary schools. This synthetic approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics that affect the assessment of Social Sciences Learning in the Independent curriculum. Rigid data management and analysis is made easier with MAXQDA, enabling effective investigation of new themes and patterns. The results identify areas for improvement and provide insight into how assessment strategies and curriculum goals fit together. Finally, this research guides pedagogical practices and promotes sustainable development within Indonesia's education system.

Keywords

independent curriculum, Social Sciences Learning, assessment strategies, mixed method approach, MAXQDA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!