
This article examines the persistent lack of accountability for colonial-era atrocities, arguing that such impunity is not a historical oversight but a product of deliberate legal and political design. Using India's colonial experience such as the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, the Sedition Law, and the Criminal Tribes Act as a central case, it explores how colonial violence was legalised, shielded, and often celebrated. The analysis extends globally to the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya and the Herero-Nama genocide in Namibia, highlighting how international law has historically excluded colonial crimes through mechanisms like the war-nexus limitation and state immunity. The article concludes by advocating for structural reforms, including repeal of colonial laws, reparative justice, and legal recognition of colonial atrocities, as essential steps toward a more equitable global legal order.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
