The Supreme Court's decision in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India marked a transformative moment in Indian constitutional jurisprudence by decriminalising consensual same-sex relations under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This case commentary analyses the Court's reasoning through the lenses of constitutional morality, individual autonomy, dignity, and equality. It examines how the judgment redefined the relationship between law, morality, and fundamental rights, particularly Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21. The commentary highlights the decision's significance in advancing LGBTQ+ rights and its broader implications for inclusive constitutional interpretation in India.