
Abstract: Thousands of jurisdictions (municipal, state, federal, international) have exposed populations to different policies over decades. This cross-jurisdictional variation is a natural experiment. Optimocracy: (1) Apply causal inference to this historical policy data, (2) Identify which policies predict above-average median income and healthy life years, (3) Publish recommendations for every major vote, (4) Track politician alignment with evidence, (5) Algorithmically fund the campaigns of the most aligned policymakers via SuperPAC. Politicians still decide; the algorithm just makes ignoring evidence expensive. Summary: Thousands of jurisdictions have made different policy and budget choices over decades, creating a natural experiment. Optimocracy applies causal inference to this cross-jurisdictional time-series data to identify which policies predict above-average median income and healthy life years. It then publishes evidence-based recommendations for every major vote, tracks politician alignment, and funds aligned candidates via SuperPAC, making suboptimal policy politically expensive while preserving democratic structures.
Category: Academic Paper, Public Policy, Political Science, Economics | Genre: Political Science, Mechanism Design, Public Policy, Economics | Target Audience: Researchers, Policy Makers, Economists, Political Scientists
decentralized-oracles, smart-contracts, political-dysfunction, central-bank-independence, rent-seeking, algorithmic-governance, metric-optimization, mechanism-design, capture-resistance, goodharts-law
decentralized-oracles, smart-contracts, political-dysfunction, central-bank-independence, rent-seeking, algorithmic-governance, metric-optimization, mechanism-design, capture-resistance, goodharts-law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
