Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Test of Infants' Daily Living Activities (IDLA): Study Protocol

Authors: Franecka, Martyna; Domagalska-Szopa, Małgorzata; Szopa, Andrzej;

Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Test of Infants' Daily Living Activities (IDLA): Study Protocol

Abstract

This document contains the study protocol for the research project assessing the Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Test of Infants' Daily Living Activities (IDLA) against the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). The protocol outlines the methodological framework implemented in the study, including: • Study Objectives: Assessment of construct validity (postural and motor control domains) and diagnostic accuracy. • Participants: Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the infant population (1-18 months). • Procedures: The examination protocol using AIMS (reference standard) and IDLA (index test). • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP): Detailed plan including Spearman’s rank correlation, ROC curve analysis for cut-off point determination (Pareto optimal criterion), and logistic regression models. This protocol details the methodology and analysis plan implemented in accordance with the ethical approval granted by the Thematic Team for Ethics in Scientific Research of Physiotherapists at the Polish Chamber of Physiotherapists (Resolution no. 15/52) on June 29, 2022.

Keywords

Test of IDLA, Study Protocol, Infant Motor Development, Validation, AIMS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!