Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Engineering and Tech...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Engineering and Technology Journal
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Operational Efficiency Analysis of Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis Systems: An OEE, Six Big Losses, And FMEA Approach

Authors: Giovana Adi, Wibowo; Farida, .;

Operational Efficiency Analysis of Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis Systems: An OEE, Six Big Losses, And FMEA Approach

Abstract

This study evaluates the operational effectiveness of Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis (BWRO) machines within a demineralized water treatment installation. The primary objective is to quantify performance using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) metric, identify the dominant causes of inefficiency through the Six Big Losses framework, and prioritize risk mitigation strategies using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). The research utilizes operational data from three BWRO units (A, B, and C) collected between January and October 2025. Results indicate an aggregate facility-wide OEE of 75.95%, falling below the world-class benchmark of 85%. Unit B achieved the highest performance (90.98%), while Unit C significantly underperformed (53.04%). The analysis of Six Big Losses reveals that Reduced Speed (49.90%) and Setup/Adjustment (39.92%) due to extended Cleaning In Place (CIP) durations are the primary contributors to lost time. FMEA identifies silica fouling as the most critical failure mode (Risk Priority Number 640). The study concludes that transitioning from calendar-based to condition-based maintenance and optimizing chemical pre-treatment are essential to restoring design capacity.

Keywords

OEE, Six Big Losses, FMEA, BWRO, Membrane Fouling, Water Treatment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average