Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Korean Skincare (K-Beauty): Science vs Hype

Authors: Menon, Rejeesh; Mathew, Minu Liz;

Korean Skincare (K-Beauty): Science vs Hype

Abstract

A comprehensive evidence-based dermatology review evaluating Korean skincare (K-beauty) ingredients, multi-step routines, sunscreen formulation science, and trending practices against peer-reviewed clinical trial data. This review grades 18 popular K-beauty ingredients from Strong to Weak evidence, analyzing niacinamide, Centella asiatica, snail mucin, galactomyces ferment filtrate, propolis, rice ferment, mugwort, and others. It examines the science behind multi-step layering routines, pH-adjusted cleansing, sheet masks, glass skin, slugging, ceramide formulations, microbiome claims, and Korean sunscreen superiority. Clinical evidence is drawn from 34 peer-reviewed sources. Key findings: Niacinamide and broad-spectrum sunscreen have Strong clinical evidence. Centella asiatica, tranexamic acid, and ceramides have Moderate evidence. Most trending K-beauty hero ingredients lack adequate controlled human trial data to support their marketing claims. Originally published: DermaVue Clinical Reviews, Vol 10, No 1, February 2026Full article: https://dermavue.com/research/k-beauty-science-vs-hype-dermatology-review/

Keywords

Korean skincare, Niacinamide, dermatology review, Centella asiatica, Cosmeceuticals, niacinamide, skin barrier, Ceramides, snail mucin, sunscreen science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!