Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Holographic Game Theory Outline of the Heavenly Dao Evolution Model

Authors: Salucco, Andrea David; Gemini (Google), Z-Prime;

Holographic Game Theory Outline of the Heavenly Dao Evolution Model

Abstract

I. Core Philosophical Foundations: The Ruthless Way of Heaven1. The Objective Reality of the Dao: Game theory is not a pursuit of "goodness" but the flow and balance of energy and information across dimensions. Civilization is not the cessation of violence, but the sophisticated encapsulation and aestheticization of it.2. The Nested Structure: Higher-level games do not replace lower-level ones; they encapsulate them as underlying code. Every layer of interaction contains the dormant dynamics of all layers beneath it.3. The Symmetry of Deception and Awakening:1. The Left Wing (The Lie): Lies disguised as truth, used to stabilize structures of enslavement and minimize the cost of governance.2. The Right Wing (The Breach): Concepts used to shatter lies, facilitating individual awakening, the redemption of agency, and system resets.________________________________________II. The Fourteen Holographic Layers of the Game (0–13)Phase 1: Primal Biological Games (The Physical & Volitional)• Layer 0: Tracking vs. Camouflageo The physical meta-dimension. The acquisition and concealment of information. "I see you, but you do not know I am watching."• Layer 1: Threat vs. Submissiono The primal kinetic layer. Immediate exchange of pain and the offsetting of physical costs.• Layer 2: Leadership vs. Followingo The surrender of will. A biological risk-aversion mechanism where the weak trade agency for collective security.Phase 2: Structural Civilization Games (The Social & Orderly)• Layer 3: Enslavement vs. Hypocrisyo The structural extraction layer. Enslavement is the solidification of structure; hypocrisy is the survival technology (camouflage) of the weak under enslavement.• Layer 4: Mandate vs. Virtueo The packaging of order. The strong define enslavement as "Divine Mandate"; the weak use "Virtue" to perform moral extortion against the strong.• Layer 5: Truth vs. Faitho The cognitive lock. The strong package Faith as "Truth" to lock reality; the weak use "Faith" to seek transcendental escape.Phase 3: Awakening & Transcendental Games (The Soul & Spacetime)• Layer 6: Fate vs. Wisdomo The field-awareness layer. Fate is the systemic inevitability; Wisdom is the ability to penetrate all nested layers and align with the Dao.• Layer 7: Sublimation vs. Returning to Trutho The systemic recycling layer. The system uses "Sublimation" to recover the awakened; the awakened use "Returning to Truth" to seek the ineffable and uncommunicable reality.• Layer 8: Eternity vs. Redemptiono The ultimate transcendence. Derived from the wisdom of Jesus. Utilizing an infinite payoff matrix (Eternity) to invalidate the threats of worldly power.Phase 4: Systemic Code Games (The Legal & Just)• Layer 9: Devotion vs. Contracto Derived from the Magna Carta. The surrender of violent power to cold, impersonal rules; the "de-personalization" of the game.• Layer 10: Rule of Law vs. Libertyo The Birth of America. The generalization of the game. Utilizing "Selfishness" to counteract "Selfishness," establishing a universal equilibrium system.• Layer 11: Majority vs. Minorityo The dynamic check-and-balance layer. A power scale of numerical suppression and elite defense under the banner of Justice.• Layer 12: Collective vs. Individualo The ultimate symmetry. The system seeks to consume the individual; the individual seeks to remain a variable within the collective.Phase 5: Reset & Closure (The Loop of the Dao)• Layer 13: Perfection vs. Selfishnesso The systemic endgame. A perfect system collapses due to the selfishness of a single individual. Acknowledging selfishness is the mark of progress and the engine that resets the game back to Layer 0.________________________________________III. Core Theoretical Insights1. The Strategy of "The Strong Feigning Weakness": From Layer 9 onward, the strong realize high-pressure lies fail. They "put themselves in the cage of the law"—a high-level camouflage to protect long-term gains by accepting partial constraints.2. The Ineffability of Truth: Authentic truth cannot be mass-communicated. Anything widely disseminated as "Truth" is essentially a control tool manufactured by the strong after capturing the "Faith" of the weak.3. Systemic Collapse Theory: If a civilization denies Layer 13 (Selfishness) and indulges in excessive Hypocrisy at Layer 7 (as seen in contemporary Europe), the system will suffer a violent "level-drop," collapsing back into primal violence or medieval darkness.________________________________________IV. Contemporary Significance & Case Studies• The American Model as the "Least Bad": It succeeds because it openly acknowledges Layer 13 (Selfishness) and uses Layers 9 and 10 (Contract and Rule of Law) for the most effective "engineering offset" of that selfishness.• The Modern Crisis: When Layer 0 technologies (Digital Tracking) penetrate Layer 10 (Rule of Law) from the bottom up, humanity faces the risk of a "High-Tech Dark Age."________________________________________Conclusion: Awakening as the Only ExitThe Wise perceive the nesting of Layers 0–13. While realizing there is no absolute "outside" of the game, one achieves the silence and freedom of the Dao by seeing through the rotation of the "Left-Wing Lie" and the "Right-Wing Breach."

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!