
Background: Although the FAIR Data Principles have guided international efforts to improve research data management, significant gaps still exist between the technical and social dimensions of their implementation in health-related contexts. Objective: This scoping review protocol aims to identify and synthesize the requirements for developing Data Management Plan (DMP) templates and DMP tools that are interoperable with data repositories, aligning them with the FAIR Principles and the researchers’ practical needs. Methods: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and BRAPCI databases. Eligible studies will include literature addressing conceptual, technical, or sociotechnical aspects of DMP templates, DMP tools, and interoperability with research data repositories. Data will be charted thematically and synthesized through a narrative approach. Expected Outcomes: The review will identify existing approaches and gaps in the development of FAIR-aligned DMP templates and interoperable DMP tools, designed to connect with other research information systems, particularly data repositories. The findings are expected to provide an evidence base for developing a sociotechnical model that promotes sustainable, interoperable, and FAIR-oriented health data infrastructures.
Data Repository, Data Management Plan, Research data
Data Repository, Data Management Plan, Research data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
