Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Meissner Effect as a Phase Defining Constraint

Authors: Maley, Amos Jay;

The Meissner Effect as a Phase Defining Constraint

Abstract

The Meissner effect—the expulsion of magnetic flux from a superconductor upon entering the superconducting phase—is traditionally described as a dynamical electromagnetic response or as a consequence of perfect conductivity. Both views obscure a deeper structural feature of superconductivity. This paper presents a theorem-level reclassification of the Meissner effect as a phase-defining kinematic constraint. Global superconducting phase coherence is formulated operationally as path-independent, gauge-invariant phase transport. It is shown that this minimal coherence condition is incompatible with non-zero interior electromagnetic curvature in simply connected bulk regions. Magnetic flux exclusion therefore follows as a logical consequence of coherence, rather than as a dynamical relaxation process. Penetration depth and flux quantization arise naturally as boundary and topological corollaries of this exclusion principle. Standard theoretical frameworks—London theory, Ginzburg–Landau theory, and BCS theory—are shown to be energetically and microscopically consistent realizations of this kinematic necessity, computing how the constraint is dynamically enforced and how measurable quantities arise once it holds. The result clarifies why the Meissner effect is universal, history-independent, and phase-defining, while remaining complementary to established microscopic and energetic descriptions. The analysis is fully gauge-invariant, corpus-independent, and does not rely on specific pairing mechanisms or material parameters.

Keywords

Superconductivity, Aharonov–Bohm effect, London theory, BCS theory, Meissner effect, Ginzburg–Landau theory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!