
This paper establishes a structural no-go theorem for the unique derivation of low-energy constants in totally constrained, background-independent quantum theories with finite observer access. Unlike a large body of work addressing protocol dependence, measurement limitations, or model-specific obstructions, the present result operates at the level of the reduced phase space itself. We show that numerical low-energy parameters (masses, couplings, cosmological constants) are not Dirac observables of the deep theory. Any operational extraction of such constants necessarily requires non-canonical externalization choices—clock selection, background or frame fixing, boundary conditions, or sector conditioning—that are not determined by the constraint algebra. As a result, the mapping from deep-kernel physics to effective low-energy constants is fundamentally non-unique. The theorem is model-independent and does not rely on quantum noise, experimental imperfections, or specific dynamical assumptions. It applies to any background-independent theory formulated as a totally constrained system. The result places a sharp upper bound on what such theories can uniquely predict and clarifies the status of vacuum multiplicity and landscape constructions as relational rather than dynamical phenomena. This work addresses a structurally narrow but foundational question. While related results exist at the operational or protocol level, no-go theorems at the level of gauge-invariant observables in totally constrained systems are comparatively rare. The present theorem is intended to serve as a reference point for future discussions of predictability, parameter derivation, and effective theory emergence in quantum gravity.
Totally constrained systems Background-independent quantum theory Dirac observables Gauge invariance Reduced phase space No-go theorem
Totally constrained systems Background-independent quantum theory Dirac observables Gauge invariance Reduced phase space No-go theorem
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
