Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Adapting the Community Engagement Studio Model to Enhance Scalability

Authors: Frank, Simone C.; Bilheimer, Alicia; Datta, Nixola; Grewe, Mary E.; Aikhuele, Eseohe; Lawal, Khadeejatul-Kubraa A.; Kappelman, Michael D.;

Adapting the Community Engagement Studio Model to Enhance Scalability

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Community Engagement (CE) Studio is an established approach for integrating community and patient perspectives into research, yet little information is available about how institutions have adapted this innovative model to suit varied organizational contexts, resources, andneeds. METHODS: We adapted the CE Studio to create a more scalable approach that: 1) requires fewer programmatic and human resources to maintain over time; 2) facilitates capacity building within research teams to conduct future engagement without external support; and 3) leverages virtual technologies. Key adaptations involved shifting to researcher-led recruitment and compensation of community partners, streamlined session planningand orientation processes, and prioritization of virtual delivery, resulting in the development of a new Community Feedback Session (CFS) service. We implemented the CFS approach at our institution and evaluated it via surveys distributed to CFS attendees and researchers. RESULTS: Between January 2022 and August 2025, we conducted 46 CFSs across 19 projects engaging 302attendees. 149 attendees and 34 researchers completed evaluation surveys. Of these, 99% of attendees indicated they would participate again, and 97% of researchers rated the CFS service as Good or Excellent, recommending it to colleagues. Attendees appreciated the structure, facilitation, composition, and size of the sessions, and many had no suggestions for improvement. Researchers described changes they made to projects based on feedback received during CFSs, including amending study protocols, altering intervention content and delivery modalities, and revising a variety of study-related materials. DISCUSSION: We successfully adapted the CE Studio model to enhance its translational impact and promote scalability across varied research contexts and settings. Evaluation data indicate that our modified CFS approach informs research in an impactful way and provides value to researchers and community partners.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Community Engagement Studio, Community Engagement, Patient Engagement, Translational Impact Summit 2026, Clinical and Translational Science, Community Feedback Session

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green