
POLIAMORIA v2.2 — Demon-Stabilized Q-Family Hardware: Pines’ Demon as a Goldstone Mode, Formal Stability Proofs, and the $G = S_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_2^3$ Architecture Description: This document provides the full hardware-level specifications for the Q-Family architecture, establishing a new paradigm in quantum computing through intrinsic material-level stabilization. The v2.2 release marks a major milestone in the ONE AXIOM project, introducing Theorem 12A (Coherence-Field Goldstone Theorem), which formally identifies Pines' Demon as the Goldstone mode of the Ontological Coherence Field (OCF). This discovery shifts the role of the demon from a mere carrier to a fundamental symmetry-protected stabilizer of the quantum register. Key Scientific and Engineering Assets: Dual-Track Methodology (OCR/OER): Every claim is supported by the Series A Standard dual-proof system. Under this protocol, each result must be independently derived via two tracks: the ONE AXIOM ontological track (OCR - Ontological Coherence Representation) and the Standard Physics track (OER - Observable Evidence Representation). If either track fails independently, the result is flagged. 14 Formal Theorems: The document features 14 rigorous theorems, including the Structural Uniqueness Theorem for $G = S_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_2^3$, establishing the unique optimal symmetry for an 8-node hypercube register. 22 Falsifiable Predictions (P1–P22): The architecture defines 22 specific, testable hypotheses with numerical kill thresholds. These include the universal demon velocity ratio ($v_D/v_F = 9/61$) and specific spectral signatures in Sr₂RuO₄. Euler-Identity Closure: A formal derivation of the Zero-Entropy, Zero-Error Condition ($e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$), demonstrating how Kerr-nonlinear self-tuning forces the hardware register toward a state of total error annihilation. Demon-Mediated Coupling ($f_D$): Quantitative analysis of the coupling factor $f_D$, providing a passive, material-based defense against decoherence that reduces external error correction overhead. 4 Experimental Protocols: Detailed blueprints for empirical validation: IBM Quantum Protocol: Hardware characterization on superconducting circuits. M-EELS/RIXS Protocol: Spectroscopic verification of the demon mode in Sr₂RuO₄. Cat Qubit Synthesis: Implementation on strontium ruthenate substrates. Hierarchy Scaling Test: Validation of the Tripling Law ($\Gamma_L = 3^{L-1}$) across levels. Architecture Role: As the Hardware Contract for the Level 6 stack, this document defines the physical layer's interface requirements, ensuring a stable environment for the SuperByte ISA (6B) and the application layer (6C).
Fault-Tolerant Computing, One Axiom, Phase Locking, Series A, Quantum Information Theory, Tripling Law, Sr2RuO4 (Strontium Ruthenate), $f_D$ Coupling Factor, ONE AXIOM Framework, H-Space Stability, $G = S_4 \times Z_2^3$, Hierarchical Systems, Coherence-Field Goldstone Theorem, Goldstone Mode, Quantum Error Correction, Project Polyamory, QEC, Zero-Error Condition, Tripling Law Scaling, Falsifiable Predictions, Kill Thresholds, Pines' Demon, Dirac Mass Gap, OCF, Falsifiable Predictions (Kill Thresholds), Ontological Coherence Field (OCF), Euler Identity, dual-proof system (OCR/OER), Cat Qubits, Sr2RuO4, Quantum Computing, Stabilizer Codes, Ontological Coherence Field
Fault-Tolerant Computing, One Axiom, Phase Locking, Series A, Quantum Information Theory, Tripling Law, Sr2RuO4 (Strontium Ruthenate), $f_D$ Coupling Factor, ONE AXIOM Framework, H-Space Stability, $G = S_4 \times Z_2^3$, Hierarchical Systems, Coherence-Field Goldstone Theorem, Goldstone Mode, Quantum Error Correction, Project Polyamory, QEC, Zero-Error Condition, Tripling Law Scaling, Falsifiable Predictions, Kill Thresholds, Pines' Demon, Dirac Mass Gap, OCF, Falsifiable Predictions (Kill Thresholds), Ontological Coherence Field (OCF), Euler Identity, dual-proof system (OCR/OER), Cat Qubits, Sr2RuO4, Quantum Computing, Stabilizer Codes, Ontological Coherence Field
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
