
In strict and competitive societies, success is not determined solely by ability or effort, but by their relationship to social expectations. This paper introduces a unified mathe- matical framework for the success index Q, emphasizing the role of self-expectation control (humility). We show that humility acts as a structural lowering mechanism of success thresh- olds. The theory is extended to generative AI usage, including free and paid models, where miscalibrated self-expectation can negate technological advantages.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
