Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D1.1 Baseline Report on Industry-Academia Co-creation Approaches

Authors: Hellwig, Imke; Bastian, Annika; Kempf, Christoph; Dühr, Katharina;

D1.1 Baseline Report on Industry-Academia Co-creation Approaches

Abstract

This report D1.1: "Baseline Report on Industry-Academia Co-Creation Approaches" is part of Work Package (WP) 1: "Human-centred development of the INDUSAC co-creation methodology" of the project "Quick challenge-driven, human-centred co-creation mechanism for INDUStry-Academia collaborations" (INDUSAC).D1.1 aims to provide a comprehensive overview of approaches to industry-academia collaboration (IAC) and to share new insights, focusing on the essential success factors for collaboration. First, the success factors for successful collaboration already identified in the literature are presented. In addition, best practice solutions on the market are also identified and introduced. Surveys and interviews provide further insights into motivation, processes, payment flows, success factors, and barriers of previous collaborations. All partners participated in conducting the interviews and surveys on both academic and industrial group. The detailed analysis and validation of the results revealed 22 essential success factors which are clustered into five groups: good communication and feedback, information and (technical) support, motivation and commitment, people and team, and structure and organization. Moreover, insights into motivation, structure, and barriers to an IAC were identified. The results obtained in this report will be used as input factors for the development of the methodology and the platform of the INDUSAC project.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!