
Adaptability and flexibility are consistently identified as critical competencies for effective teamwork, yet measuring them in practice remains a significant challenge. This article introduces a six-dimension model for classifying conversational behaviors that signal team adaptability, grounded in peer-reviewed research in organizational behavior and work psychology, and informed by the author's prior work on modeling conversational behaviors in instructional dialogue. The model identifies observable verbal indicators across six dimensions: Problem-Solving & Strategy Adjustment, Flexibility in Roles & Responsibilities, Resource & Time Management, Emotional & Stress Management, Anticipation & Contingency Planning, and Reevaluation & Reframing. Each dimension is mapped to established theoretical frameworks, including Burke et al.'s (2006) four-phase model of adaptive team performance, Marks et al.'s (2001) temporally based taxonomy of team processes, and Pulakos et al.'s (2000) eight-dimension taxonomy of adaptive performance. The framework offers a practical, research-grounded approach for observing and assessing team adaptability as it occurs in the flow of workplace meetings.
adaptive performance, Artificial intelligence, team processes, dialogue acts, conversational behavior, shared mental models, Psychological Safety, team adaptability, Psychological Safety/psychology, annotation schema, organizational behaviour, conversational ai
adaptive performance, Artificial intelligence, team processes, dialogue acts, conversational behavior, shared mental models, Psychological Safety, team adaptability, Psychological Safety/psychology, annotation schema, organizational behaviour, conversational ai
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
