Decision Displacement names a recurring structural move in complex systems: theconversion of a decisive point into a sequence of procedures, reviews, thresholds, oriterations such that no actor must fully own the final commitment. The core claim isnot that systems avoid decisions out of cowardice or malice, but that systemsoperate under asymmetrical exposure: the cost of being definitively wrong is oftenhigher than the cost of being indefinitely incomplete. Under scrutiny, systemstherefore behave as if they optimize for reversibility and survivability—outcomesthat can be defended, appealed, revised, or re-framed—while still appearing toprogress. This document defines Decision Displacement as an impersonal lens andspecifies how it can be detected through stable traces (proceduralization, escalation,deferral loops, committee multiplication, and language that relocates ownership). Itprovides minimal validity conditions to keep claims structural and non-ideological.Decision Displacement is presented as a companion operation to Descriptive Closure(ICF-0): when a system cannot afford further explicitness, it often displaces decisionsinto process to remain institutionally survivable.