
Non-uniform distribution of electric current density in a conductor, attributable to electric currents in the neighbouring conductors, is referred to as proximity effect. The term proximity effect only expresses the qualitative description of reality. The subject of the article is an analysis of induced voltage and current in a segment of a loop formed by two long parallel conductors of arbitrary cross section connected to a source (transmission line) and in the equivalent circuit of the loop segment, which is a series RL circuit. The original contribution of the article is an analysis of the definitions of self-inductance coefficients, which characterize an inductor, and determine the voltage induced on the inductor and the current in the equivalent RL circuit. It is shown that the calculation of induced voltage and current in terms of self-inductance coefficients is in principle inaccurate, in particular when the proximity effect applies.
Real controller, Phasor Measurement Unit, VA 6.1, Fault conditions, Hardware-in-the-loop, VUT, 214 021, VZ6, Real-time simulator, 214 023
Real controller, Phasor Measurement Unit, VA 6.1, Fault conditions, Hardware-in-the-loop, VUT, 214 021, VZ6, Real-time simulator, 214 023
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
