
Table 4. Discriminant Analyses results for two species of Odontesthes. GroupsNCases correctly grouped (%)Discriminant FunctionVariance explained (%)Canonical correlationEigenvaluesWilks’ Lambda significationRegression with size significationO. bonariensis, O. hatcheri, and presumptive hybrids (3 groups)43689.0197.50.9438.0190.000>0.0522.50.4110.2030.0000.000O. bonariensis sampling sites (5 groups)100100156.20.9539,8940.0000.001233.80.9255.9540.0000.00236.90.7411.2160.000>0.0543.10.5950.5490.007>0.05O. hatcheri sampling sites (12 groups)31590.8147.60.9448.1130.0000.000214.60.8452.4910.000>0.0531.10.8091.8990.000>0.0546.70.7311.1460.000>0.0555.70.7010.9660.000>0.0564.40.6550.7520.000>0.0573.30.6020.5690.000>0.0582.70.5650.4690.000>0.0591.60.4600.2690.000>0.05101.20.4060.1970.000>0.05110.60.3140.1100.006>0.05
Published as part of Conte-Grand, Cecilia, Sommer, Julie, Ortí, Guillermo & Cussac, Víctor, 2015, Populations of Odontesthes (Teleostei: Atheriniformes) in the Andean region of Southern South America: body shape and hybrid individuals, pp. 144 in Neotropical Ichthyology 13 (1) on page 144, DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20130094, http://zenodo.org/record/12718290
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
