Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

LLM-Based Metadata and Context Extraction for Agricultural Long-Term Experiments

Authors: Lachmuth, Susanne; Hoffmann, Carsten; Donmez, Cenk; Ryo, Masahiro; Lischeid, Gunnar;

LLM-Based Metadata and Context Extraction for Agricultural Long-Term Experiments

Abstract

Long-term agricultural field experiments (LTEs) provide essential data spanning decades for crop modeling and understanding agricultural processes under global change. Despite their scientific value, broader reuse of LTE data is limited by two factors: each experiment focuses on a narrow set of experimental factors, and many fail to follow FAIR data principles. The LTE‑Overview Map (https://bonares.de/ltfe/) has made significant progress by assembling comprehensive metadata for roughly 680 long‑term experiments worldwide. This resource now enables synthesis studies that combine multiple LTEs. However, the metadata collection remains incomplete and relies on time‑consuming manual curation. To overcome these bottlenecks, we developed an automated pipeline that combines large language models (LLMs) with rigorously defined Pydantic data schemas. Implemented as a Python workflow, the system parses the scientific literature associated with each LTE, extracts relevant experimental descriptors, and translates them into standardized, interoperable metadata records. We also extract the research context and specific objectives for which LTE data are used in each scientific paper. This information serves as an initial indicator for evaluating data fitness‑for‑purpose and tracking LTE data reuse. Beyond the structural checks imposed by the Pydantic schemas, we are currently implementing semantic verification and LLM-as-judge checks with additional human supervision. We will present results of these approaches, which enable standardized evaluation of the results. This LLM-driven approach towards metadata management not only accelerates metadata curation and enhances data discoverability but also provides the basis for a more comprehensive understanding of how LTE data are used across the agricultural research community.

Keywords

LLM, Metadata, FAIRagro Plenary 2025, Large Language Models, Natural language processing, Long-term agricultural field experiments, metadata, M1.4, Research Data Management, Agriculture, Pydantic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities