Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D2.1 Quasi-harmonized testing protocol for low and high temperature electrolysis

Authors: Raimondi, Giulia; Banerjee, Aayan; Butt, Esaar Naeem; Kirsch, Pino; Köhler, Vincent;

D2.1 Quasi-harmonized testing protocol for low and high temperature electrolysis

Abstract

This document provides experimental testing protocols for assessing critical factors driving perfor-mance degradation of water electrolysis cells and stacks that will be used in the framework of the funded project DELYCIOUS (Project number: 101192075). It corresponds to the deliverable D2.1 of WP 2 Lab scale testing.The protocol will be applied to three different electrolysis technologies: Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (PEMEL), Alkaline Electrolysis (AEL), Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOEL). Albeit the net chemical reaction remains the same in the three encompassed technologies, the nature of the materials and conditions employed differs. This translates in differences in the experimental conditions and protocols required to assess the performance degradation mechanisms affecting the three technologies. Never-theless, based on the similarity of the type of key degradation effects under examination, their out-comes and their means of determination, this document is defined as “quasi-harmonized testing pro-tocol”.These protocols are intended for use in the framework of the project to highlight key degradation mechanisms and their operational causes using advanced monitoring and diagnostic tools developed in the framework of DELYCIOUS, ultimately allowing to develop, within the duration of the project, operational scenarios to improve cell/stack lifetime.Their use in other contexts by both the research community and industry, for research and develop-ment (R&D) purposes as benchmarking aid is welcomed.A review of the three technologies, in terms of a detailed description of their functionality, materials employed at stack and cell level as well as the current developments, is outside the scope of this docu-ment and only definitions deemed necessary for understanding the protocol will be recalled in text.

Keywords

PEMEL, high temperature, SOEL, testprotocol, electrolysis, EU funded, AEL, low temperature, DELYCIOUS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green