Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Multidimensional AI-Enabled Software Engineering Practices and Entrepreneurial Innovation Performance: A Conceptual Framework

Authors: Maryam Folakemi Adepoju1, Abdullateef Ajibola Adepoju2, Aliyu Mohammed3;

Multidimensional AI-Enabled Software Engineering Practices and Entrepreneurial Innovation Performance: A Conceptual Framework

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in software engineering has transformed the ways entrepreneurial ventures innovate, yet the multidimensional impact of AI-enabled practices on entrepreneurial innovation performance remains underexplored. This study aims to develop a conceptual framework linking AI-enabled software engineering practices including automation-driven development, intelligent testing, AI-based code generation, DevOps integration, and AI-driven security to entrepreneurial innovation performance, measured across product, process, and business model dimensions. The research uses the conceptual approach, in which the findings are based on the data available in the secondary sources, such as academic journals, books, conference papers, historical documents, and reliable online sources. The literature review points out that the use of AI practices promotes efficiency, minimizes errors, prototyping, constant process improvements, and organizational learning, which in turn drive the results of innovation in the context of entrepreneurship. Theory Theoretical evidence reveals that the influence of AI adoption is moderated by workforce preparedness, knowledge management, and organizational capacities, whereas the integration of security strategies can guarantee sustainable and reliable innovation. On the basis of these understandings, the research advises entrepreneurs and software companies to plan fully embrace and integrate AI-enabled practices, allocate resources to upskilling groups, and align technological usage with organizational capacity. The study concludes that AI-enabled software engineering practices are critical drivers of entrepreneurial innovation, although empirical validation and context-specific research are needed to confirm the framework’s applicability across diverse markets. KEYWORDS: Artificial Intelligence, Software Engineering, Automation, Entrepreneurial Innovation, DevOps, Code Generation, Innovation Performance.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Multidimensional AI-Enabled Software Engineering Practices and Entrepreneurial Innovation Performance: A Conceptual Framework, DevOps, Automation, SSAR Publishers, SSAR Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (SSARJMS), Artificial Intelligence, Software Engineering, Entrepreneurial Innovation, Innovation Performance, Code Generation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green