Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Electoral Financing in Nigeria: The Role of INEC as Regulatory Agency in the Fourth Republic

Authors: OLAYODE, Kayode Adesoye; MAGUTU, Justine Mokeira (Ph.D); AMADI, Henry Odongo (Ph.D);

Electoral Financing in Nigeria: The Role of INEC as Regulatory Agency in the Fourth Republic

Abstract

Nigeria’s Fourth Republic (1999–present) has witnessed a more monetized electoral campaign, with vote-buying and the use of state resources for electoral benefit posing recurrent challenges. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) plays a dual role as both an electoral management body responsible for promoting democratic participation and a regulatory authority overseeing political parties and campaign finance. This paper uses a qualitative and documentary research approach to analyze secondary data, including a historical context of Nigeria’s electoral processes and recent data, such as post-2023 election results. In addition to offering a focused study and reform agenda to improve regulation and lessen the detrimental impact of money on Nigerian elections, it assesses how well INEC's enforcement procedures and legal obligations correspond. Key findings indicate that while legal frameworks, such as the Electoral Act 2022, have improved formal regulation of political finance, enforcement remains weak, disclosure compliance is limited, and new funding channels, along with clientelist manipulation of social programs, are complicating efforts to control electoral campaigns. The study includes empirical, descriptive, and case studies of Nigeria’s electoral challenges. It offers practical, evidence-based recommendations rooted in African experiences. The paper compares institutional efforts to curb financial malpractices with measures to improve the credibility of the electoral process. Among other recommendations, it advocates the institutionalization of a digital political finance disclosure system and strengthening the Electoral Act to enhance enforcement capabilities.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average