Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Resolving upper mantle anisotropy in 3-D: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben area, Central Europe

Authors: Fröhlich, Yvonne;

Resolving upper mantle anisotropy in 3-D: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben area, Central Europe

Abstract

Abstract The analysis of long-term data (15-25 yr) regarding shear wave splitting (SWS) of SKS, SKKS, PKS (XKS) phases at six (semi-)permanent broadband seismological recording stations (BFO, WLS, STU, ECH, TMO44, TMO07) indicates vertical and small-lateral variations of the seismic anisotropy underneath the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) area.In this study, the two splitting parameters, the fast polarization direction Φ and the delay time δt, are measured, and show characteristic backazimuthal variations. Additionally, the splitting intensity is calculated. SKS-SKKS phase pairs show no significant discrepancies and therefore do not indicate a significant contribution from the lowermost mantle. Thus, the observed anisotropy is assumed to be located in the upper mantle (lithosphere and asthenosphere). To explain the SWS measurements, structural anisotropy models with one layer with a horizontal (simple anisotropy) as well as a tilted symmetry axis and two layers with horizontal symmetry axes (complex anisotropy) are tested in a modeling procedure based on forward-calculated synthetic splitting parameters. Besides fitting the whole backazimuth (BAZ) range, the modeling is limited to station-specific BAZ ranges. The consideration of differences and similarities in the splitting pattern across the recording stations allows to outline subregions with different anisotropy regimes and by this to propose a structural 3-D model of the anisotropy in the upper mantle underneath the URG: Differences are found between the east and the west sides of the URG (change of the fast polarization directions) and between the Moldanubian Zone in the south and the Saxothuringian Zone in the north (change from two layers to one layer). Inconsistent splitting parameters and the observation of numerous nulls (no SWS), especially underneath the southern URG in the southwest of BFO, may be at least partly related to scattering of the seismic wavefield or a modification of the mantle material. Additional materials Talk mentioned in the section "Modeling: strucutral models": https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18524089 Related peer-reviewed journal articles Fröhlich Y, Grund M, Ritter J R R (2024). Lateral and vertical variations of seismic anisotropy in the lithosphere-asthenosphere system underneath Central Europe from long-term splitting measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 239(1):112-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae245. Ritter J R R, Fröhlich Y, Sanz Alonso Y, Grund M (2022). Short-scale laterally varying SK(K)S shear wave splitting at BFO, Germany – implications for the determination of anisotropic structures. Journal of Seismology, 26:1137-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10112-w, correction https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10136-w.

Keywords

forwardt modeling, Upper Rhine Graben, geophysics, Central Europe, Black Forest Observatory, numeric modeling, seismic anisotropy, SplitLab, seismology, shear wave splitting, StackSplit

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!