
Large language model (LLM) hallucination is universally treated as a defect to be minimized. We argue this framing is backwards. We present LUCID (Leveraging Unverified Claims Into Deliverables), a development methodology that deliberately invokes LLM hallucination, extracts the resulting claims as testable requirements, verifies them against a real codebase, and iteratively converges hallucinated fiction toward verified reality. We provide theoretical grounding through predictive processing, the mathematical equivalence between transformer attention and hippocampal pattern completion, and the REBUS model. We demonstrate convergence from 57.3% to 90.8% compliance across six iterations on a production application. 12 pages, 5 tables, 35 references. Open-source CLI implementation available.
Preprint. Open-source CLI implementation at https://github.com/gtsbahamas/hallucination-reversing-system
neuroscience, specification generation, iterative convergence, AI safety, predictive processing, large language models, requirements engineering, confabulation, LLM hallucination, software engineering
neuroscience, specification generation, iterative convergence, AI safety, predictive processing, large language models, requirements engineering, confabulation, LLM hallucination, software engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
